24 Using Parallel Execution

Variations in the Number of Parallel Execution Servers

If the number of parallel operations processed concurrently by an instance changes significantly, Oracle automatically changes the number of parallel execution servers in the pool.

If the number of parallel operations increases, Oracle creates additional parallel execution servers to handle incoming requests. However, Oracle never creates more parallel execution servers for an instance than the value specified by the initialization parameter PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS.

If the number of parallel operations decreases, Oracle terminates any parallel execution servers that have been idle for a threshold period of time. Oracle does not reduce the size of the pool less than the value of PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS, no matter how long the parallel execution servers have been idle.

Processing Without Enough Parallel Execution Servers

Oracle can process a parallel operation with fewer than the requested number of processes.

If all parallel execution servers in the pool are occupied and the maximum number of parallel execution servers has been started, the parallel execution coordinator switches to serial processing.

See "Minimum Number of Parallel Execution Servers" for information about using the initialization parameter PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT and "Tuning General Parameters for Parallel Execution" for information about the PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT and PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS initialization parameters.

Dividing Work Among Parallel Execution Servers

The parallel execution coordinator examines the redistribution requirements of each operation. An operation's redistribution requirement is the way in which the rows operated on by the operation must be divided or redistributed among the parallel execution servers.

After determining the redistribution requirement for each operation in the execution plan, the optimizer determines the order in which the operations must be performed. With this information, the optimizer determines the data flow of the statement.

As an example of parallel query with intra- and inter-operation parallelism, consider the following, more complex query:

SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(employees 4) PARALLEL(departments 4) 
       USE_HASH(employees) ORDERED */ MAX(salary), AVG(salary)
FROM employees, departments
WHERE employees.department_id = departments.department_id 
GROUP BY employees.department_id;

Note that hints have been used in the query to force the join order and join method, and to specify the DOP of the tables employees and departments. In general, you should let the optimizer determine the order and method.

Figure 24-2 illustrates the data flow graph or query plan for this query.

Figure 24-2 Data Flow Diagram for Joining Tables

Description of the illustration cncpt019.gif

Parallelism Between Operations

Given two sets of parallel execution servers SS1 and SS2 for the query plan illustrated in Figure 24-2, the execution will proceed as follows: each server set (SS1 and SS2) will have four execution processes because of the PARALLEL hint in the query that specifies the DOP. In other words, the DOP will be four because each set of parallel execution servers will have four processes.

Slave set SS1 first scans the table employees while SS2 will fetch rows from SS1 and build a hash table on the rows. In other words, the parent servers in SS2 and the child servers in SS2 work concurrently: one in scanning employees in parallel, the other in consuming rows sent to it from SS1 and building the hash table for the hash join in parallel. This is an example of inter-operation parallelism.

After SS1 has finished scanning the entire table employees (that is, all granules or task units for employees are exhausted), it scans the table departments in parallel. It sends its rows to servers in SS2, which then perform the probes to finish the hash-join in parallel. After SS1 is done scanning the table departments in parallel and sending the rows to SS2, it switches to performing the GROUP BY in parallel. This is how two server sets run concurrently to achieve inter-operation parallelism across various operators in the query tree while achieving intra-operation parallelism in executing each operation in parallel.

Another important aspect of parallel execution is the re-partitioning of rows while they are sent from servers in one server set to another. For the query plan in Figure 24-2, after a server process in SS1 scans a row of employees, which server process of SS2 should it send it to? The partitioning of rows flowing up the query tree is decided by the operator into which the rows are flowing into. In this case, the partitioning of rows flowing up from SS1 performing the parallel scan of employees into SS2 performing the parallel hash-join is done by hash partitioning on the join column value. That is, a server process scanning employees computes a hash function of the value of the column employees.employee_id to decide the number of the server process in SS2 to send it to. The partitioning method used in parallel queries is explicitly shown in the EXPLAIN PLAN of the query. Note that the partitioning of rows being sent between sets of execution servers should not be confused with Oracle's partitioning feature whereby tables can be partitioned using hash, range, and other methods.

Producer Operations

Operations that require the output of other operations are known as consumer operations. In Figure 24-2, the GROUP BY SORT operation is the producer of the HASH JOIN operation because GROUP BY SORT requires the HASH JOIN output.

Producer operations can begin consuming rows as soon as the producer operations have produced rows. In the previous example, while the parallel execution servers are producing rows in the FULL SCAN departments operation, another set of parallel execution servers can begin to perform the HASH JOIN operation to consume the rows.

Each of the two operations performed concurrently is given its own set of parallel execution servers. Therefore, both query operations and the data flow tree itself have parallelism. The parallelism of an individual operation is called intraoperation parallelism and the parallelism between operations in a data flow tree is called interoperation parallelism. Due to the producer-consumer nature of the Oracle server's operations, only two operations in a given tree need to be performed simultaneously to minimize execution time. To illustrate intraoperation and interoperation parallelism, consider the following statement:

SELECT * FROM employees ORDER BY last_name;

The execution plan implements a full scan of the employees table. This operation is followed by a sorting of the retrieved rows, based on the value of the last_name column. For the sake of this example, assume the last_name column is not indexed. Also assume that the DOP for the query is set to 4, which means that four parallel execution servers can be active for any given operation.

Figure 24-3 illustrates the parallel execution of the example query.

Figure 24-3 Interoperation Parallelism and Dynamic Partitioning

Description of the illustration dwhsg090.gif

As you can see from Figure 24-3, there are actually eight parallel execution servers involved in the query even though the DOP is 4. This is because a parent and child operator can be performed at the same time (interoperation parallelism).

Also note that all of the parallel execution servers involved in the scan operation send rows to the appropriate parallel execution server performing the SORT operation. If a row scanned by a parallel execution server contains a value for the last_name column between A and G, that row gets sent to the first ORDER BY parallel execution server. When the scan operation is complete, the sorting processes can return the sorted results to the coordinator, which, in turn, returns the complete query results to the user.

Parallel Queries on Index-Organized Tables

The following parallel scan methods are supported on index-organized tables:

• Parallel fast full scan of a nonpartitioned index-organized table

• Parallel fast full scan of a partitioned index-organized table

• Parallel index range scan of a partitioned index-organized table

These scan methods can be used for index-organized tables with overflow areas and for index-organized tables that contain LOBs.

Nonpartitioned Index-Organized Tables

Parallel query on a nonpartitioned index-organized table uses parallel fast full scan. The DOP is determined, in decreasing order of priority, by:

1. A PARALLEL hint (if present)

2. An ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL QUERY statement

3. The parallel degree associated with the table, if the parallel degree is specified in the CREATE TABLE or ALTER TABLE statement

The allocation of work is done by dividing the index segment into a sufficiently large number of block ranges and then assigning the block ranges to parallel execution servers in a demand-driven manner. The overflow blocks corresponding to any row are accessed in a demand-driven manner only by the process which owns that row.

Partitioned Index-Organized Tables

Both index range scan and fast full scan can be performed in parallel. For parallel fast full scan, parallelization is exactly the same as for nonpartitioned index-organized tables. For parallel index range scan on partitioned index-organized tables, the DOP is the minimum of the degree picked up from the previous priority list (like in parallel fast full scan) and the number of partitions in the index-organized table. Depending on the DOP, each parallel execution server gets one or more partitions (assigned in a demand-driven manner), each of which contains the primary key index segment and the associated overflow segment, if any.

Parallel Queries on Object Types

Parallel queries can be performed on object type tables and tables containing object type columns. Parallel query for object types supports all of the features that are available for sequential queries on object types, including:

• Methods on object types

• Attribute access of object types

• Constructors to create object type instances

• Object views

• PL/SQL and OCI queries for object types

There are no limitations on the size of the object types for parallel queries.

The following restrictions apply to using parallel query for object types.

• A MAP function is needed to parallelize queries involving joins and sorts (through ORDER BY, GROUP BY, or set operations). In the absence of a MAP function, the query will automatically be executed serially.

• Parallel DML and parallel DDL are not supported with object types. DML and DDL statements are always performed serially.

In all cases where the query cannot execute in parallel because of any of these restrictions, the whole query executes serially without giving an error message.

DDL Statements That Can Be Parallelized

You can parallelize DDL statements for tables and indexes that are nonpartitioned or partitioned. Table 24-3 summarizes the operations that can be parallelized in DDL statements.

The parallel DDL statements for nonpartitioned tables and indexes are:

• CREATE INDEX

• CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT

• ALTER INDEX ... REBUILD

The parallel DDL statements for partitioned tables and indexes are:

• CREATE INDEX

• CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT

• ALTER TABLE ... [MOVE|SPLIT|COALESCE] PARTITION

• ALTER INDEX ... [REBUILD|SPLIT] PARTITION

  • This statement can be executed in parallel only if the (global) index partition being split is usable.

All of these DDL operations can be performed in no-logging mode for either parallel or serial execution.

CREATE TABLE for an index-organized table can be parallelized either with or without an AS SELECT clause.

Different parallelism is used for different operations (see Table 24-3). Parallel CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT statements on partitioned tables and parallel CREATE INDEX statements on partitioned indexes execute with a DOP equal to the number of partitions.

Partition parallel analyze table is made less necessary by the ANALYZE {TABLE, INDEX} PARTITION statements, since parallel analyze of an entire partitioned table can be constructed with multiple user sessions.

Parallel DDL cannot occur on tables with object columns. Parallel DDL cannot occur on non-partitioned tables with LOB columns.

CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT in Parallel

For performance reasons, decision support applications often require large amounts of data to be summarized or rolled up into smaller tables for use with ad hoc, decision support queries. Rollup occurs regularly (such as nightly or weekly) during a short period of system inactively.

Parallel execution lets you parallelize the query and create operations of creating a table as a subquery from another table or set of tables.

Clustered tables cannot be created and populated in parallel.

Figure 24-4 illustrates creating a table from a subquery in parallel.

Figure 24-4 Creating a Summary Table in Parallel

Description of the illustration dwhsg088.gif

Recoverability and Parallel DDL

When summary table data is derived from other tables' data, recoverability from media failure for the smaller summary table may not be important and can be turned off during creation of the summary table.

If you disable logging during parallel table creation (or any other parallel DDL operation), you should back up the tablespace containing the table once the table is created to avoid loss of the table due to media failure.

Use the NOLOGGING clause of the CREATE TABLE, CREATE INDEX, ALTER TABLE, and ALTER INDEX statements to disable undo and redo log generation.

Space Management for Parallel DDL

Creating a table or index in parallel has space management implications that affect both the storage space required during a parallel operation and the free space available after a table or index has been created.

Storage Space When Using Dictionary-Managed Tablespaces

When creating a table or index in parallel, each parallel execution server uses the values in the STORAGE clause of the CREATE statement to create temporary segments to store the rows. Therefore, a table created with a NEXT setting of 5 MB and a PARALLEL DEGREE of 12 consumes at least 60 megabytes (MB) of storage during table creation because each process starts with an extent of 5 MB. When the parallel execution coordinator combines the segments, some of the segments may be trimmed, and the resulting table may be smaller than the requested 60 MB.

Free Space and Parallel DDL

When you create indexes and tables in parallel, each parallel execution server allocates a new extent and fills the extent with the table or index data. Thus, if you create an index with a DOP of 3, the index will have at least three extents initially. Allocation of extents is the same for rebuilding indexes in parallel and for moving, splitting, or rebuilding partitions in parallel.

Serial operations require the schema object to have at least one extent. Parallel creations require that tables or indexes have at least as many extents as there are parallel execution servers creating the schema object.

When you create a table or index in parallel, it is possible to create pockets of free space—either external or internal fragmentation. This occurs when the temporary segments used by the parallel execution servers are larger than what is needed to store the rows.

• If the unused space in each temporary segment is larger than the value of the MINIMUM EXTENT parameter set at the tablespace level, then Oracle trims the unused space when merging rows from all of the temporary segments into the table or index. The unused space is returned to the system free space and can be allocated for new extents, but it cannot be coalesced into a larger segment because it is not contiguous space (external fragmentation).

• If the unused space in each temporary segment is smaller than the value of the MINIMUM EXTENT parameter, then unused space cannot be trimmed when the rows in the temporary segments are merged. This unused space is not returned to the system free space; it becomes part of the table or index (internal fragmentation) and is available only for subsequent inserts or for updates that require additional space.

For example, if you specify a DOP of 3 for a CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT statement, but there is only one datafile in the tablespace, then internal fragmentation may occur, as shown in Figure 24-5. The pockets of free space within the internal table extents of a datafile cannot be coalesced with other free space and cannot be allocated as extents.

See Oracle Database Performance Tuning Guide for more information about creating tables and indexes in parallel.

Figure 24-5 Unusable Free Space (Internal Fragmentation)

Description of the illustration dwhsg091.gif

Advantages of Parallel DML over Manual Parallelism

You can parallelize DML operations manually by issuing multiple DML statements simultaneously against different sets of data. For example, you can parallelize manually by:

• Issuing multiple INSERT statements to multiple instances of an Oracle Real Application Clusters to make use of free space from multiple free list blocks.

• Issuing multiple UPDATE and DELETE statements with different key value ranges or rowid ranges.

However, manual parallelism has the following disadvantages:

• It is difficult to use. You have to open multiple sessions (possibly on different instances) and issue multiple statements.

• There is a lack of transactional properties. The DML statements are issued at different times; and, as a result, the changes are done with inconsistent snapshots of the database. To get atomicity, the commit or rollback of the various statements must be coordinated manually (maybe across instances).

• The work division is complex. You may have to query the table in order to find out the rowid or key value ranges to correctly divide the work.

• The calculation is complex. The calculation of the degree of parallelism can be complex.

• There is a lack of affinity and resource information. You need to know affinity information to issue the right DML statement at the right instance when running an Oracle Real Application Clusters. You also have to find out about current resource usage to balance workload across instances.

Parallel DML removes these disadvantages by performing inserts, updates, and deletes in parallel automatically.

When to Use Parallel DML

Parallel DML operations are mainly used to speed up large DML operations against large database objects. Parallel DML is useful in a DSS environment where the performance and scalability of accessing large objects are important. Parallel DML complements parallel query in providing you with both querying and updating capabilities for your DSS databases.

The overhead of setting up parallelism makes parallel DML operations infeasible for short OLTP transactions. However, parallel DML operations can speed up batch jobs running in an OLTP database.

Some of the scenarios where parallel DML is used include:

• Refreshing Tables in a Data Warehouse System

• Creating Intermediate Summary Tables

• Using Scoring Tables

• Updating Historical Tables

• Running Batch Jobs

Enabling Parallel DML

A DML statement can be parallelized only if you have explicitly enabled parallel DML in the session with the ENABLE PARALLEL DML clause of the ALTER SESSION statement. This mode is required because parallel DML and serial DML have different locking, transaction, and disk space requirements.

The default mode of a session is DISABLE PARALLEL DML. When parallel DML is disabled, no DML will be executed in parallel even if the PARALLEL hint is used.

When parallel DML is enabled in a session, all DML statements in this session will be considered for parallel execution. However, even if parallel DML is enabled, the DML operation may still execute serially if there are no parallel hints or no tables with a parallel attribute or if restrictions on parallel operations are violated.

The session's PARALLEL DML mode does not influence the parallelism of SELECT statements, DDL statements, and the query portions of DML statements. Thus, if this mode is not set, the DML operation is not parallelized, but scans or join operations within the DML statement may still be parallelized.

Transaction Restrictions for Parallel DML

To execute a DML operation in parallel, the parallel execution coordinator acquires or spawns parallel execution servers, and each parallel execution server executes a portion of the work under its own parallel process transaction.

• Each parallel execution server creates a different parallel process transaction.

• If you use rollback segments instead of Automatic Undo Management, you may want to reduce contention on the rollback segments. To do this, only a few parallel process transactions should reside in the same rollback segment. See Oracle Database SQL Reference for more information.

The coordinator also has its own coordinator transaction, which can have its own rollback segment. In order to ensure user-level transactional atomicity, the coordinator uses a two-phase commit protocol to commit the changes performed by the parallel process transactions.

A session that is enabled for parallel DML may put transactions in the session in a special mode: If any DML statement in a transaction modifies a table in parallel, no subsequent serial or parallel query or DML statement can access the same table again in that transaction. This means that the results of parallel modifications cannot be seen during the transaction.

Serial or parallel statements that attempt to access a table that has already been modified in parallel within the same transaction are rejected with an error message.

If a PL/SQL procedure or block is executed in a parallel DML enabled session, then this rule applies to statements in the procedure or block.

Rollback Segments

If you use rollback segments instead of Automatic Undo Management, there are some restrictions when using parallel DML. See Oracle Database SQL Reference for information about restrictions for parallel DML and rollback segments.

Recovery for Parallel DML

The time required to roll back a parallel DML operation is roughly equal to the time it takes to perform the forward operation.

Oracle supports parallel rollback after transaction and process failures, and after instance and system failures. Oracle can parallelize both the rolling forward stage and the rolling back stage of transaction recovery.

See Oracle Database Backup and Recovery Basics for details about parallel rollback.

Space Considerations for Parallel DML

Parallel UPDATE uses the space in the existing object, while direct-path INSERT gets new segments for the data.

Space usage characteristics may be different in parallel than sequential execution because multiple concurrent child transactions modify the object.

Lock and Enqueue Resources for Parallel DML

A parallel DML operation's lock and enqueue resource requirements are very different from the serial DML requirements. Parallel DML holds many more locks, so you should increase the starting value of the ENQUEUE_RESOURCES and DML_LOCKS parameters. See "DML_LOCKS" for more information.

Restrictions on Parallel DML

The following restrictions apply to parallel DML (including direct-path INSERT):

• Intra-partition parallelism for UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE operations require that the COMPATIBLE initialization parameter be set to 9.2 or greater.

• INSERT, UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE operations on nonpartitioned tables are not parallelized if there is a bitmap index on the table. If the table is partitioned and there is a bitmap index on the table, the degree of parallelism will be restricted to at most the number of partitions accessed.

• A transaction can contain multiple parallel DML statements that modify different tables, but after a parallel DML statement modifies a table, no subsequent serial or parallel statement (DML or query) can access the same table again in that transaction.

  • This restriction also exists after a serial direct-path INSERT statement: no subsequent SQL statement (DML or query) can access the modified table during that transaction.

  • Queries that access the same table are allowed before a parallel DML or direct-path INSERT statement, but not after.

  • Any serial or parallel statements attempting to access a table that has already been modified by a parallel UPDATE, DELETE, or MERGE, or a direct-path INSERT during the same transaction are rejected with an error message.

• Parallel DML operations cannot be done on tables with triggers.

• Replication functionality is not supported for parallel DML.

• Parallel DML cannot occur in the presence of certain constraints: self-referential integrity, delete cascade, and deferred integrity. In addition, for direct-path INSERT, there is no support for any referential integrity.

• Parallel DML can be done on tables with object columns provided you are not touching the object columns.

• Parallel DML can be done on tables with LOB columns provided the table is partitioned. However, intra-partition parallelism is not supported.

• A transaction involved in a parallel DML operation cannot be or become a distributed transaction.

• Clustered tables are not supported.

Violations of these restrictions cause the statement to execute serially without warnings or error messages (except for the restriction on statements accessing the same table in a transaction, which can cause error messages). For example, an update is serialized if it is on a nonpartitioned table.

Data Integrity Restrictions

This section describes the interactions of integrity constraints and parallel DML statements.

Trigger Restrictions

A DML operation will not be parallelized if the affected tables contain enabled triggers that may get fired as a result of the statement. This implies that DML statements on tables that are being replicated will not be parallelized.

Relevant triggers must be disabled in order to parallelize DML on the table. Note that, if you enable or disable triggers, the dependent shared cursors are invalidated.

Distributed Transaction Restrictions

A DML operation cannot be parallelized if it is in a distributed transaction or if the DML or the query operation is against a remote object.

Examples of Distributed Transaction Parallelization

This section contains several examples of distributed transaction processing.

INSERT /* APPEND PARALLEL (t3,2) */ INTO t3 SELECT * FROM t4@dblink;

DELETE /*+ PARALLEL (t1, 2) */ FROM t1@dblink;

SELECT * FROM t1@dblink; 
DELETE /*+ PARALLEL (t2,2) */ FROM t2;
COMMIT; 

Functions in Parallel Queries

In a SELECT statement or a subquery in a DML or DDL statement, a user-written function may be executed in parallel if it has been declared with the PARALLEL_ENABLE keyword, if it is declared in a package or type and has a PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES that indicates all of WNDS, RNPS, and WNPS, or if it is declared with CREATE FUNCTION and the system can analyze the body of the PL/SQL code and determine that the code neither writes to the database nor reads or modifies package variables.

Other parts of a query or subquery can sometimes execute in parallel even if a given function execution must remain serial.

See Oracle Database Application Developer's Guide - Fundamentals for information about the PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES and Oracle Database SQL Reference for information about CREATE FUNCTION.

Functions in Parallel DML and DDL Statements

In a parallel DML or DDL statement, as in a parallel query, a user-written function may be executed in parallel if it has been declared with the PARALLEL_ENABLE keyword, if it is declared in a package or type and has a PRAGMA RESTRICT_REFERENCES that indicates all of RNDS, WNDS, RNPS, and WNPS, or if it is declared with CREATE FUNCTION and the system can analyze the body of the PL/SQL code and determine that the code neither reads nor writes to the database or reads nor modifies package variables.

For a parallel DML statement, any function call that cannot be executed in parallel causes the entire DML statement to be executed serially.

For an INSERT ... SELECT or CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT statement, function calls in the query portion are parallelized according to the parallel query rules in the prior paragraph. The query may be parallelized even if the remainder of the statement must execute serially, or vice versa.

Hints and Degree of Parallelism

You can specify hints in a SQL statement to set the DOP for a table or index and for the caching behavior of the operation.

• The PARALLEL hint is used only for operations on tables. You can use it to parallelize queries and DML statements (INSERT, UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE).

• The PARALLEL_INDEX hint parallelizes an index range scan of a partitioned index. (In an index operation, the PARALLEL hint is not valid and is ignored.)

See Oracle Database Performance Tuning Guide for information about using hints in SQL statements and the specific syntax for the PARALLEL, NO_PARALLEL, PARALLEL_INDEX, CACHE, and NOCACHE hints.

Table and Index Definitions

You can specify the DOP within a table or index definition by using one of the following statements: CREATE TABLE, ALTER TABLE, CREATE INDEX, or ALTER INDEX.

Default Degree of Parallelism

The default DOP is used when you ask to parallelize an operation but you do not specify a DOP in a hint or within the definition of a table or index. The default DOP is appropriate for most applications.

The default DOP for a SQL statement is determined by the following factors:

• The value of the parameter CPU_COUNT, which is, by default, the number of CPUs on the system, the number of RAC instances, and the value of the parameter PARALLEL_THREADS_PER_CPU.

• For parallelizing by partition, the number of partitions that will be accessed, based on partition pruning.

• For parallel DML operations with global index maintenance, the minimum number of transaction free lists among all the global indexes to be updated. The minimum number of transaction free lists for a partitioned global index is the minimum number across all index partitions. This is a requirement to prevent self-deadlock.

These factors determine the default number of parallel execution servers to use. However, the actual number of processes used is limited by their availability on the requested instances during run time. The initialization parameter PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS sets an upper limit on the total number of parallel execution servers that an instance can have.

If a minimum fraction of the desired parallel execution servers is not available (specified by the initialization parameter PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT), a user error is produced. You can retry the query when the system is less busy.

Adaptive Multiuser Algorithm

With the adaptive multiuser algorithm, the parallel execution coordinator varies the DOP according to the system load. Oracle determines the load by calculating the number of active Oracle Server processes. If the number of server processes currently allocated is larger than the optimal number of server processes, given the number of available CPUs, the algorithm reduces the DOP. This reduction improves total system throughput by avoiding overallocation of resources.

Minimum Number of Parallel Execution Servers

Oracle can perform an operation in parallel as long as at least two parallel execution servers are available. If too few parallel execution servers are available, your SQL statement may execute slower than expected. You can specify the minimum percentage of requested parallel execution servers that must be available in order for the operation to execute. This strategy ensures that your SQL statement executes with a minimum acceptable parallel performance. If the minimum percentage of requested parallel execution servers is not available, the SQL statement does not execute and returns an error ora 12827.

The initialization parameter PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT specifies the desired minimum percentage of requested parallel execution servers. This parameter affects DML and DDL operations as well as queries.

For example, if you specify 50 for this parameter, then at least 50 percent of the parallel execution servers requested for any parallel operation must be available in order for the operation to succeed. If 20 parallel execution servers are requested, then at least 10 must be available or an error is returned to the user. If PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT is set to null, then all parallel operations will proceed as long as at least two parallel execution servers are available for processing.

Limiting the Number of Available Instances

In Oracle Real Application Clusters, instance groups can be used to limit the number of instances that participate in a parallel operation. You can create any number of instance groups, each consisting of one or more instances. You can then specify which instance group is to be used for any or all parallel operations. Parallel execution servers will only be used on instances which are members of the specified instance group. See Oracle Real Application Clusters Administrator's Guide and Oracle Real Application Clusters Deployment and Performance Guide for more information about instance groups.

Rules for Parallelizing Queries

This section discusses some rules for parallelizing queries.

Rules for UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE

UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE operations are parallelized by partition or subpartition. Update, merge, and delete parallelism are not possible within a partition, nor on a nonpartitioned table. See "Limitation on the Degree of Parallelism" for a possible restriction.

You have two ways to specify parallel directives for UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE operations (assuming that PARALLEL DML mode is enabled):

• Use a parallel clause in the definition of the table being updated or deleted (the reference object).

• Use an update, merge, or delete parallel hint in the statement.

Parallel hints are placed immediately after the UPDATE, MERGE, or DELETE keywords in UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE statements. The hint also applies to the underlying scan of the table being changed.

You can use the ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL DML statement to override parallel clauses for subsequent UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE statements in a session. Parallel hints in UPDATE, MERGE, and DELETE statements override the ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL DML statement.

UPDATE tbl_1 SET c1=c1+1 WHERE c1>100;

UPDATE /*+ PARALLEL(tbl_2,4) */ tbl_2 SET c1=c1+1;

Rules for INSERT ... SELECT

An INSERT ... SELECT statement parallelizes its INSERT and SELECT operations independently, except for the DOP.

You can specify a parallel hint after the INSERT keyword in an INSERT ... SELECT statement. Because the tables being queried are usually not the same as the table being inserted into, the hint enables you to specify parallel directives specifically for the insert operation.

You have the following ways to specify parallel directives for an INSERT ... SELECT statement (assuming that PARALLEL DML mode is enabled):

• SELECT parallel hints specified at the statement

• Parallel clauses specified in the definition of tables being selected

• INSERT parallel hint specified at the statement

• Parallel clause specified in the definition of tables being inserted into

You can use the ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL DML statement to override parallel clauses for subsequent INSERT operations in a session. Parallel hints in insert operations override the ALTER SESSION FORCE PARALLEL DML statement.

INSERT /*+ PARALLEL(tbl_ins,2) */ INTO tbl_ins
SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(tbl_sel,4) */ * FROM tbl_sel;

Rules for DDL Statements

You need to keep the following in mind when parallelizing DDL statements.

Rules for [CREATE | REBUILD] INDEX or [MOVE | SPLIT] PARTITION

The following rules apply:

Rules for CREATE TABLE AS SELECT

The CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT statement contains two parts: a CREATE part (DDL) and a SELECT part (query). Oracle can parallelize both parts of the statement. The CREATE part follows the same rules as other DDL operations.

Summary of Parallelization Rules

Table 24-3 shows how various types of SQL statements can be parallelized and indicates which methods of specifying parallelism take precedence.

• The priority (1) specification overrides priority (2) and priority (3).

• The priority (2) specification overrides priority (3).

How the Adaptive Multiuser Algorithm Works

The adaptive multiuser algorithm has several inputs. The algorithm first considers the number of active Oracle Server processes as calculated by Oracle. The algorithm then considers the default settings for parallelism as set in the initialization parameter file, as well as parallelism options used in CREATE TABLE and ALTER TABLE statements and SQL hints.

When a system is overloaded and the input DOP is larger than the default DOP, the algorithm uses the default degree as input. The system then calculates a reduction factor that it applies to the input DOP. For example, using a 16-CPU system, when the first user enters the system and it is idle, it will be granted a DOP of 32. The next user will be give a DOP of eight, the next four, and so on. If the system settles into a steady state of eight users issuing queries, all the users will eventually be given a DOP of 4, thus dividing the system evenly among all the parallel users.

PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS

The PARALLEL_MAX_SEVERS parameter sets a resource limit on the maximum number of processes available for parallel execution. Most parallel operations need at most twice the number of query server processes as the maximum DOP attributed to any table in the operation.

Oracle sets PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS to a default value that is sufficient for most systems. The default value for PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS is as follows:

(CPU_COUNT x PARALLEL_THREADS_PER_CPU x (2 if PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET > 0; otherwise 1) x 5)

This might not be enough for parallel queries on tables with higher DOP attributes. We recommend users who expects to run queries of higher DOP to set PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS as follows:

2 x DOP x NUMBER_OF_CONCURRENT_USERS

For example, setting PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS to 64 will allow you to run four parallel queries simultaneously, assuming that each query is using two slave sets with a DOP of eight for each set.

If the hardware system is neither CPU bound nor I/O bound, then you can increase the number of concurrent parallel execution users on the system by adding more query server processes. When the system becomes CPU- or I/O-bound, however, adding more concurrent users becomes detrimental to the overall performance. Careful setting of PARALLEL_MAX_SERVERS is an effective method of restricting the number of concurrent parallel operations.

If users initiate too many concurrent operations, Oracle might not have enough query server processes. In this case, Oracle executes the operations sequentially or displays an error if PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT is set to a value other than the default value of 0 (zero).

This condition can be verified through the GV$SYSSTAT view by comparing the statistics for parallel operations not downgraded and parallel operations downgraded to serial. For example:

SELECT * FROM GV$SYSSTAT WHERE name LIKE 'Parallel operation%';

Increasing the Number of Concurrent Users

To increase the number of concurrent users, you must restrict the resource usage of each individual user. You can achieve this by using the parallel adaptive multiuser feature or by using resource consumer groups. See Oracle Database Administrator's Guide and Oracle Database Concepts for more information about resource consumer groups and the Database Resource Manager.

Limiting the Number of Resources for a User

You can limit the amount of parallelism available to a given user by establishing a resource consumer group for the user. Do this to limit the number of sessions, concurrent logons, and the number of parallel processes that any one user or group of users can have.

Each query server process working on a parallel execution statement is logged on with a session ID. Each process counts against the user's limit of concurrent sessions. For example, to limit a user to 10 parallel execution processes, set the user's limit to 11. One process is for the parallel coordinator and the other 10 consist of two sets of query server servers. This would allow one session for the parallel coordinator and 10 sessions for the parallel execution processes.

See Oracle Database Administrator's Guide for more information about managing resources with user profiles and Oracle Real Application Clusters Administrator's Guide for more information on querying GV$ views.

PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS

The recommended value for the PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS parameter is 0 (zero), which is the default.

This parameter lets you specify in a single instance the number of processes to be started and reserved for parallel operations. The syntax is:

PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS=n 

The n variable is the number of processes you want to start and reserve for parallel operations.

Setting PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS balances the startup cost against memory usage. Processes started using PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS do not exit until the database is shut down. This way, when a query is issued the processes are likely to be available. It is desirable, however, to recycle query server processes periodically since the memory these processes use can become fragmented and cause the high water mark to slowly increase. When you do not set PARALLEL_MIN_SERVERS, processes exit after they are idle for five minutes.

SHARED_POOL_SIZE

Parallel execution requires memory resources in addition to those required by serial SQL execution. Additional memory is used for communication and passing data between query server processes and the query coordinator.

Oracle Database allocates memory for query server processes from the shared pool. Tune the shared pool as follows:

• Allow for other clients of the shared pool, such as shared cursors and stored procedures.

• Remember that larger values improve performance in multiuser systems, but smaller values use less memory.

• You must also take into account that using parallel execution generates more cursors. Look at statistics in the V$SQLAREA view to determine how often Oracle recompiles cursors. If the cursor hit ratio is poor, increase the size of the pool. This happens only when you have a large number of distinct queries.

  You can then monitor the number of buffers used by parallel execution and compare the shared pool PX msg pool to the current high water mark reported in output from the view V$PX_PROCESS_SYSSTAT.

  
  

  Note: If you do not have enough memory available, error message 12853 occurs (insufficient memory for PX buffers: current stringK, max needed stringK). This is caused by having insufficient SGA memory available for PX buffers. You need to reconfigure the SGA to have at least (MAX - CURRENT) bytes of additional memory.

  
  

By default, Oracle allocates parallel execution buffers from the shared pool.

If Oracle displays the following error on startup:

ORA-27102: out of memory 
SVR4 Error: 12: Not enough space 

You should reduce the value for SHARED_POOL_SIZE low enough so your database starts. After reducing the value of SHARED_POOL_SIZE, you might see the error:

ORA-04031: unable to allocate 16084 bytes of shared memory 
   ("SHARED pool","unknown object","SHARED pool heap","PX msg pool") 

If so, execute the following query to determine why Oracle could not allocate the 16,084 bytes:

SELECT NAME, SUM(BYTES) FROM V$SGASTAT WHERE POOL='SHARED POOL' 
  GROUP BY ROLLUP (NAME); 

Your output should resemble the following:

NAME                       SUM(BYTES) 
-------------------------- ---------- 
PX msg pool                   1474572 
free memory                    562132
                              2036704 

If you specify SHARED_POOL_SIZE and the amount of memory you need to reserve is bigger than the pool, Oracle does not allocate all the memory it can get. Instead, it leaves some space. When the query runs, Oracle tries to get what it needs. Oracle uses the 560 KB and needs another 16KB when it fails. The error does not report the cumulative amount that is needed. The best way of determining how much more memory is needed is to use the formulas in "Adding Memory for Message Buffers".

To resolve the problem in the current example, increase the value for SHARED_POOL_SIZE. As shown in the sample output, the SHARED_POOL_SIZE is about 2 MB. Depending on the amount of memory available, you could increase the value of SHARED_POOL_SIZE to 4 MB and attempt to start your database. If Oracle continues to display an ORA-4031 message, gradually increase the value for SHARED_POOL_SIZE until startup is successful.

Computing Additional Memory Requirements for Message Buffers

After you determine the initial setting for the shared pool, you must calculate additional memory requirements for message buffers and determine how much additional space you need for cursors.

Adjusting Memory After Processing Begins

The formulas in this section are just starting points. Whether you are using automated or manual tuning, you should monitor usage on an on-going basis to make sure the size of memory is not too large or too small. To do this, tune the shared pool using the following query:

SELECT POOL, NAME, SUM(BYTES) FROM V$SGASTAT WHERE POOL LIKE '%pool%'
  GROUP BY ROLLUP (POOL, NAME);

Your output should resemble the following:

POOL        NAME                       SUM(BYTES) 
----------- -------------------------- ---------- 
shared pool Checkpoint queue                38496 
shared pool KGFF heap                        1964 
shared pool KGK heap                         4372 
shared pool KQLS heap                     1134432 
shared pool LRMPD SGA Table                 23856 
shared pool PLS non-lib hp                   2096 
shared pool PX subheap                     186828 
shared pool SYSTEM PARAMETERS               55756 
shared pool State objects                 3907808 
shared pool character set memory            30260 
shared pool db_block_buffers               200000 
shared pool db_block_hash_buckets           33132 
shared pool db_files                       122984 
shared pool db_handles                      52416 
shared pool dictionary cache               198216 
shared pool dlm shared memory             5387924 
shared pool enqueue_resources               29016 
shared pool event statistics per sess      264768 
shared pool fixed allocation callback        1376 
shared pool free memory                  26329104 
shared pool gc_*                            64000 
shared pool latch nowait fails or sle       34944 
shared pool library cache                 2176808 
shared pool log_buffer                      24576 
shared pool log_checkpoint_timeout          24700 
shared pool long op statistics array        30240 
shared pool message pool freequeue         116232 
shared pool miscellaneous                  267624 
shared pool processes                       76896 
shared pool session param values            41424 
shared pool sessions                       170016 
shared pool sql area                      9549116 
shared pool table columns                  148104 
shared pool trace_buffers_per_process     1476320 
shared pool transactions                    18480 
shared pool trigger inform                  24684 
shared pool                              52248968 
                                         90641768 

Evaluate the memory used as shown in your output, and alter the setting for SHARED_POOL_SIZE based on your processing needs.

To obtain more memory usage statistics, execute the following query:

SELECT * FROM V$PX_PROCESS_SYSSTAT WHERE STATISTIC LIKE 'Buffers%';

Your output should resemble the following:

STATISTIC                           VALUE 
-------------------                 ----- 
Buffers Allocated                   23225 
Buffers Freed                       23225 
Buffers Current                         0 
Buffers HWM                          3620 

The amount of memory used appears in the Buffers Current and Buffers HWM statistics. Calculate a value in bytes by multiplying the number of buffers by the value for PARALLEL_EXECUTION_MESSAGE_SIZE. Compare the high water mark to the parallel execution message pool size to determine if you allocated too much memory. For example, in the first output, the value for large pool as shown in px msg pool is 38,092,812 or 38 MB. The Buffers HWM from the second output is 3,620, which when multiplied by a parallel execution message size of 4,096 is 14,827,520, or approximately 15 MB. In this case, the high water mark has reached approximately 40 percent of its capacity.

PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT

The recommended value for the PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT parameter is 0 (zero).

This parameter enables users to wait for an acceptable DOP, depending on the application in use. Setting this parameter to values other than 0 (zero) causes Oracle to return an error when the requested DOP cannot be satisfied by the system at a given time. For example, if you set PARALLEL_MIN_PERCENT to 50, which translates to 50 percent, and the DOP is reduced by 50 percent or greater because of the adaptive algorithm or because of a resource limitation, then Oracle returns ORA-12827. For example:

SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(e, 8, 1) */ d.department_id, SUM(SALARY)
FROM employees e, departments d WHERE e.department_id = d.department_id
GROUP BY d.department_id ORDER BY d.department_id;

Oracle responds with this message:

ORA-12827: insufficient parallel query slaves available

PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET

You can simplify and improve the way PGA memory is allocated by enabling automatic PGA memory management. In this mode, Oracle dynamically adjusts the size of the portion of the PGA memory dedicated to work areas, based on an overall PGA memory target explicitly set by the DBA. To enable automatic PGA memory management, you have to set the initialization parameter PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET. See Oracle Database Performance Tuning Guide for descriptions of how to use PGA_AGGREGATE_TARGET in different scenarios.

PARALLEL_EXECUTION_MESSAGE_SIZE

The PARALLEL_EXECUTION_MESSAGE_SIZE parameter specifies the size of the buffer used for parallel execution messages. The default value is os specific, but is typically 2K. This value should be adequate for most applications, however, increasing this value can improve performance. Consider increasing this value if you have adequate free memory in the shared pool or if you have sufficient operating system memory and can increase your shared pool size to accommodate the additional amount of memory required.

Parameters Affecting Resource Consumption for Parallel DML and Parallel DDL

The parameters that affect parallel DML and parallel DDL resource consumption are:

• TRANSACTIONS

• FAST_START_PARALLEL_ROLLBACK

• LOG_BUFFER

• DML_LOCKS

• ENQUEUE_RESOURCES

Parallel inserts, updates, and deletes require more resources than serial DML operations. Similarly, PARALLEL CREATE TABLE ... AS SELECT and PARALLEL CREATE INDEX can require more resources. For this reason, you may need to increase the value of several additional initialization parameters. These parameters do not affect resources for queries.

DB_CACHE_SIZE

When you perform parallel updates, merges, and deletes, the buffer cache behavior is very similar to any OLTP system running a high volume of updates.

DB_BLOCK_SIZE

The recommended value for this parameter is 8 KB or 16 KB.

Set the database block size when you create the database. If you are creating a new database, use a large block size such as 8 KB or 16 KB.

DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT

The recommended value for this parameter is eight for 8 KB block size, or four for 16 KB block size. The default is 8.

This parameter determines how many database blocks are read with a single operating system READ call. The upper limit for this parameter is platform-dependent. If you set DB_FILE_MULTIBLOCK_READ_COUNT to an excessively high value, your operating system will lower the value to the highest allowable level when you start your database. In this case, each platform uses the highest value possible. Maximum values generally range from 64 KB to 1 MB.

DISK_ASYNCH_IO and TAPE_ASYNCH_IO

The recommended value for both of these parameters is TRUE.

These parameters enable or disable the operating system's asynchronous I/O facility. They allow query server processes to overlap I/O requests with processing when performing table scans. If the operating system supports asynchronous I/O, leave these parameters at the default value of TRUE. Figure 24-6 illustrates how asynchronous read works.

Figure 24-6 Asynchronous Read

Description of the illustration dwhsg097.gif

Asynchronous operations are currently supported for parallel table scans, hash joins, sorts, and serial table scans. However, this feature can require operating system specific configuration and may not be supported on all platforms. Check your Oracle operating system-specific documentation.

V$PX_BUFFER_ADVICE

The V$PX_BUFFER_ADVICE view provides statistics on historical and projected maximum buffer usage by all parallel queries. You can consult this view to reconfigure SGA size in response to insufficient memory problems for parallel queries.

V$PX_SESSION

The V$PX_SESSION view shows data about query server sessions, groups, sets, and server numbers. It also displays real-time data about the processes working on behalf of parallel execution. This table includes information about the requested DOP and the actual DOP granted to the operation.

V$PX_SESSTAT

The V$PX_SESSTAT view provides a join of the session information from V$PX_SESSION and the V$SESSTAT table. Thus, all session statistics available to a normal session are available for all sessions performed using parallel execution.

V$PX_PROCESS

The V$PX_PROCESS view contains information about the parallel processes, including status, session ID, process ID, and other information.

V$PX_PROCESS_SYSSTAT

The V$PX_PROCESS_SYSSTAT view shows the status of query servers and provides buffer allocation statistics.

V$PQ_SESSTAT

The V$PQ_SESSTAT view shows the status of all current server groups in the system such as data about how queries allocate processes and how the multiuser and load balancing algorithms are affecting the default and hinted values. V$PQ_SESSTAT will be obsolete in a future release.

You might need to adjust some parameter settings to improve performance after reviewing data from these views. In this case, refer to the discussion of "Tuning General Parameters for Parallel Execution". Query these views periodically to monitor the progress of long-running parallel operations.

For many dynamic performance views, you must set the parameter TIMED_STATISTICS to TRUE in order for Oracle to collect statistics for each view. You can use the ALTER SYSTEM or ALTER SESSION statements to turn TIMED_STATISTICS on and off.

V$FILESTAT

The V$FILESTAT view sums read and write requests, the number of blocks, and service times for every datafile in every tablespace. Use V$FILESTAT to diagnose I/O and workload distribution problems.

You can join statistics from V$FILESTAT with statistics in the DBA_DATA_FILES view to group I/O by tablespace or to find the filename for a given file number. Using a ratio analysis, you can determine the percentage of the total tablespace activity used by each file in the tablespace. If you make a practice of putting just one large, heavily accessed object in a tablespace, you can use this technique to identify objects that have a poor physical layout.

You can further diagnose disk space allocation problems using the DBA_EXTENTS view. Ensure that space is allocated evenly from all files in the tablespace. Monitoring V$FILESTAT during a long-running operation and then correlating I/O activity to the EXPLAIN PLAN output is a good way to follow progress.

V$PARAMETER

The V$PARAMETER view lists the name, current value, and default value of all system parameters. In addition, the view shows whether a parameter is a session parameter that you can modify online with an ALTER SYSTEM or ALTER SESSION statement.

V$PQ_TQSTAT

As a simple example, consider a hash join between two tables, with a join on a column with only two distinct values. At best, this hash function will have one hash value to parallel execution server A and the other to parallel execution server B. A DOP of two is fine, but, if it is four, then at least two parallel execution servers have no work. To discover this type of skew, use a query similar to the following example:

SELECT dfo_number, tq_id, server_type, process, num_rows
FROM V$PQ_TQSTAT ORDER BY dfo_number DESC, tq_id, server_type, process;

The best way to resolve this problem might be to choose a different join method; a nested loop join might be the best option. Alternatively, if one of the join tables is small relative to the other, a BROADCAST distribution method can be hinted using PQ_DISTRIBUTE hint. Note that the optimizer considers the BROADCAST distribution method, but requires OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE set to 9.0.2 or higher.

Now, assume that you have a join key with high cardinality, but one of the values contains most of the data, for example, lava lamp sales by year. The only year that had big sales was 1968, and thus, the parallel execution server for the 1968 records will be overwhelmed. You should use the same corrective actions as described previously.

The V$PQ_TQSTAT view provides a detailed report of message traffic at the table queue level. V$PQ_TQSTAT data is valid only when queried from a session that is executing parallel SQL statements. A table queue is the pipeline between query server groups, between the parallel coordinator and a query server group, or between a query server group and the coordinator. The table queues are represented explicitly in the operation column by PX SEND <partitioning type> (for example, PX SEND HASH) and PX RECEIVE. For backward compatibility, the row labels of PARALLEL_TO_PARALLEL, SERIAL_TO_PARALLEL, or PARALLEL_TO_SERIAL will continue to have the same semantics as previous releases and can be used as before to infer the table queue allocation. In addition, the top of the parallel plan is marked by a new node with operation PX COORDINATOR.

V$PQ_TQSTAT has a row for each query server process that reads from or writes to in each table queue. A table queue connecting 10 consumer processes to 10 producer processes has 20 rows in the view. Sum the bytes column and group by TQ_ID, the table queue identifier, to obtain the total number of bytes sent through each table queue. Compare this with the optimizer estimates; large variations might indicate a need to analyze the data using a larger sample.

Compute the variance of bytes grouped by TQ_ID. Large variances indicate workload imbalances. You should investigate large variances to determine whether the producers start out with unequal distributions of data, or whether the distribution itself is skewed. If the data itself is skewed, this might indicate a low cardinality, or low number of distinct values.

Note that the V$PQ_TQSTAT view will be renamed in a future release to V$PX_TQSTSAT.

V$SESSTAT and V$SYSSTAT

The V$SESSTAT view provides parallel execution statistics for each session. The statistics include total number of queries, DML and DDL statements executed in a session and the total number of intrainstance and interinstance messages exchanged during parallel execution during the session.

V$SYSSTAT provides the same statistics as V$SESSTAT, but for the entire system.

Size of Temporary Extents

When using a locally managed temporary tablespace, extents are all the same size because this helps avoid fragmentation. As a general rule, temporary extents should be smaller than permanent extents because there are more demands for temporary space, and parallel processes or other operations running concurrently must share the temporary tablespace. Normally, temporary extents should be in the range of 1MB to 10MB. Once you allocate an extent, it is available for the duration of an operation. If you allocate a large extent but only need to use a small amount of space, the unused space in the extent is unavailable.

At the same time, temporary extents should be large enough that processes do not have to wait for space. Temporary tablespaces use less overhead than permanent tablespaces when allocating and freeing a new extent. However, obtaining a new temporary extent still requires the overhead of acquiring a latch and searching through the SGA structures, as well as SGA space consumption for the sort extent pool.

See Oracle Database Performance Tuning Guide for information regarding locally-managed temporary tablespaces.

PDML and Direct-Path Restrictions

If a parallel restriction is violated, the operation is simply performed serially. If a direct-path INSERT restriction is violated, then the APPEND hint is ignored and a conventional insert is performed. No error message is returned.

Limitation on the Degree of Parallelism

If you are performing parallel UPDATE, MERGE, or DELETE operations, the DOP is equal to or less than the number of partitions in the table.

For tables created prior to Oracle database release version 9.0.1 or tables that do not have the PDML itl invariant property, the previous PDML restriction applies to the calculation of the DOP. To see what tables do not have this property, issue the following statement:

SELECT u.name, o.name FROM obj$ o, tab$ t, user$ u
WHERE o.obj# = t.obj# AND o.owner# = u.user# AND
  bitand(t.property,536870912) != 536870912;

Using Local and Global Striping

Parallel updates and deletes work only on partitioned tables. They can generate a high number of random I/O requests during index maintenance.

For local index maintenance, local striping is most efficient in reducing I/O contention because one server process only goes to its own set of disks and disk controllers. Local striping also increases availability in the event of one disk failing.

For global index maintenance (partitioned or nonpartitioned), globally striping the index across many disks and disk controllers is the best way to distribute the number of I/Os.

Increasing INITRANS

If you have global indexes, a global index segment and global index blocks are shared by server processes of the same parallel DML statement. Even if the operations are not performed against the same row, the server processes can share the same index blocks. Each server transaction needs one transaction entry in the index block header before it can make changes to a block. Therefore, in the CREATE INDEX or ALTER INDEX statements, you should set INITRANS, the initial number of transactions allocated within each data block, to a large value, such as the maximum DOP against this index.

Limitation on Available Number of Transaction Free Lists for Segments

There is a limitation on the available number of transaction free lists for segments in dictionary-managed tablespaces. Once a segment has been created, the number of process and transaction free lists is fixed and cannot be altered. If you specify a large number of process free lists in the segment header, you might find that this limits the number of transaction free lists that are available. You can abate this limitation the next time you re-create the segment header by decreasing the number of process free lists; this leaves more room for transaction free lists in the segment header.

For UPDATE and DELETE operations, each server process can require its own transaction free list. The parallel DML DOP is thus effectively limited by the smallest number of transaction free lists available on the table and on any of the global indexes the DML statement must maintain. For example, if the table has 25 transaction free lists and the table has two global indexes, one with 50 transaction free lists and one with 30 transaction free lists, the DOP is limited to 25. If the table had had 40 transaction free lists, the DOP would have been limited to 30.

The FREELISTS parameter of the STORAGE clause is used to set the number of process free lists. By default, no process free lists are created.

The default number of transaction free lists depends on the block size. For example, if the number of process free lists is not set explicitly, a 4 KB block has about 80 transaction free lists by default. The minimum number of transaction free lists is 25.

Using Multiple Archivers

Parallel DDL and parallel DML operations can generate a large amount of redo logs. A single ARCH process to archive these redo logs might not be able to keep up. To avoid this problem, you can spawn multiple archiver processes. This can be done manually or by using a job queue.

Database Writer Process (DBWn) Workload

Parallel DML operations dirty a large number of data, index, and undo blocks in the buffer cache during a short period of time. For example, suppose you see a high number of free_buffer_waits after querying the V$SYSTEM_EVENT view, as in the following syntax:

SELECT TOTAL_WAITS FROM V$SYSTEM_EVENT WHERE EVENT = 'FREE BUFFER WAITS';

In this case, you should consider increasing the DBWn processes. If there are no waits for free buffers, the query will not return any rows.

[NO]LOGGING Clause

The [NO]LOGGING clause applies to tables, partitions, tablespaces, and indexes. Virtually no log is generated for certain operations (such as direct-path INSERT) if the NOLOGGING clause is used. The NOLOGGING attribute is not specified at the INSERT statement level but is instead specified when using the ALTER or CREATE statement for a table, partition, index, or tablespace.

When a table or index has NOLOGGING set, neither parallel nor serial direct-path INSERT operations generate redo logs. Processes running with the NOLOGGING option set run faster because no redo is generated. However, after a NOLOGGING operation against a table, partition, or index, if a media failure occurs before a backup is taken, then all tables, partitions, and indexes that have been modified might be corrupted.

Direct-path INSERT operations (except for dictionary updates) never generate redo logs. The NOLOGGING attribute does not affect undo, only redo. To be precise, NOLOGGING allows the direct-path INSERT operation to generate a negligible amount of redo (range-invalidation redo, as opposed to full image redo).

For backward compatibility, [UN]RECOVERABLE is still supported as an alternate keyword with the CREATE TABLE statement. This alternate keyword might not be supported, however, in future releases.

At the tablespace level, the logging clause specifies the default logging attribute for all tables, indexes, and partitions created in the tablespace. When an existing tablespace logging attribute is changed by the ALTER TABLESPACE statement, then all tables, indexes, and partitions created after the ALTER statement will have the new logging attribute; existing ones will not change their logging attributes. The tablespace-level logging attribute can be overridden by the specifications at the table, index, or partition level.

The default logging attribute is LOGGING. However, if you have put the database in NOARCHIVELOG mode, by issuing ALTER DATABASE NOARCHIVELOG, then all operations that can be done without logging will not generate logs, regardless of the specified logging attribute.

Parallel DML Tip 1: INSERT

Oracle INSERT functionality can be summarized as follows:

If parallel DML is enabled and there is a PARALLEL hint or PARALLEL attribute set for the table in the data dictionary, then inserts are parallel and appended, unless a restriction applies. If either the PARALLEL hint or PARALLEL attribute is missing, the insert is performed serially.

Parallel DML Tip 2: Direct-Path INSERT

The append mode is the default during a parallel insert: data is always inserted into a new block which is allocated to the table. Therefore the APPEND hint is optional. You should use append mode to increase the speed of INSERT operations, but not when space utilization needs to be optimized. You can use NOAPPEND to override append mode.

The APPEND hint applies to both serial and parallel insert: even serial inserts are faster if you use this hint. APPEND, however, does require more space and locking overhead.

You can use NOLOGGING with APPEND to make the process even faster. NOLOGGING means that no redo log is generated for the operation. NOLOGGING is never the default; use it when you wish to optimize performance. It should not normally be used when recovery is needed for the table or partition. If recovery is needed, be sure to take a backup immediately after the operation. Use the ALTER TABLE [NO]LOGGING statement to set the appropriate value.

Parallel DML Tip 3: Parallelizing INSERT, MERGE, UPDATE, and DELETE

When the table or partition has the PARALLEL attribute in the data dictionary, that attribute setting is used to determine parallelism of INSERT, UPDATE, and DELETE statements as well as queries. An explicit PARALLEL hint for a table in a statement overrides the effect of the PARALLEL attribute in the data dictionary.

You can use the NO_PARALLEL hint to override a PARALLEL attribute for the table in the data dictionary. In general, hints take precedence over attributes.

DML operations are considered for parallelization only if the session is in a PARALLEL DML enabled mode. (Use ALTER SESSION ENABLE PARALLEL DML to enter this mode.) The mode does not affect parallelization of queries or of the query portions of a DML statement.

INSERT /*+ PARALLEL(EMP) */ INTO employees
SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(ACME_EMP) */ *  FROM ACME_EMP;

UPDATE /*+ PARALLEL(EMP) */ employees
SET SAL=SAL * 1.1 WHERE JOB='CLERK' AND DEPTNO IN
  (SELECT DEPTNO FROM DEPT WHERE LOCATION='DALLAS');

DELETE /*+ PARALLEL(PRODUCTS) */ FROM PRODUCTS 
WHERE PRODUCT_CATEGORY ='GROCERY';

Updating the Table in Parallel

The following statement is a straightforward SQL implementation of the update using subqueries:

UPDATE customers SET(c_name, c_addr) = (SELECT c_name, c_addr
FROM diff_customer WHERE diff_customer.c_key = customer.c_key)
WHERE c_key IN(SELECT c_key FROM diff_customer);

Unfortunately, the two subqueries in this statement affect performance.

An alternative is to rewrite this query using updatable join views. To do this, you must first add a primary key constraint to the diff_customer table to ensure that the modified columns map to a key-preserved table:

CREATE UNIQUE INDEX diff_pkey_ind ON diff_customer(c_key) PARALLEL NOLOGGING;
ALTER TABLE diff_customer ADD PRIMARY KEY (c_key);

You can then update the customers table with the following SQL statement:

UPDATE /*+ PARALLEL(cust_joinview) */
(SELECT /*+ PARALLEL(customers) PARALLEL(diff_customer) */
CUSTOMER.c_name AS c_name CUSTOMER.c_addr AS c_addr,
diff_customer.c_name AS c_newname, diff_customer.c_addr AS c_newaddr
   WHERE customers.c_key = diff_customer.c_key) cust_joinview
   SET c_name = c_newname, c_addr = c_newaddr;

The base scans feeding the join view cust_joinview are done in parallel. You can then parallelize the update to further improve performance, but only if the customers table is partitioned.

Inserting the New Rows into the Table in Parallel

The last phase of the refresh process consists of inserting the new rows from the diff_customer temporary table to the customer table. Unlike the update case, you cannot avoid having a subquery in the INSERT statement:

INSERT /*+PARALLEL(customers)*/ INTO customers SELECT * FROM diff_customer s);

However, you can guarantee that the subquery is transformed into an anti-hash join by using the HASH_AJ hint. Doing so enables you to use parallel INSERT to execute the preceding statement efficiently. Parallel INSERT is applicable even if the table is not partitioned.

Merging in Parallel

You can combine updates and inserts into one statement, commonly known as a merge. The following statement achieves the same result as all of the statements in "Updating the Table in Parallel" and "Inserting the New Rows into the Table in Parallel":

MERGE INTO customers USING diff_customer
ON (diff_customer.c_key = customer.c_key) WHEN MATCHED THEN
  UPDATE SET (c_name, c_addr) = (SELECT c_name, c_addr 
  FROM diff_customer WHERE diff_customer.c_key = customers.c_key) 
WHEN NOT MATCHED THEN
  INSERT VALUES (diff_customer.c_key,diff_customer.c_data);